LIKES

Is't possible?

Pen_alias    27 February, 2026
Prev Next
Is't possible?

-


Please Login to comment
28/02/2026 Edited   Pen_alias Pen_alias
He's telling the story. You can't blame a guy for padding his part.

28/02/2026 Edited   MadameCercle MadameCercle
Mmmm m

28/02/2026 Edited   Mark Burkhart Mark Burkhart
He should stop upstaging Sherlock

28/02/2026 Edited   Mark Burkhart Mark Burkhart
Oh never mind...that's Waddleson

28/02/2026 Edited   Mark Burkhart Mark Burkhart
I forget

28/02/2026 Edited   Mark Burkhart Mark Burkhart
Why is Sherlock a duck?

28/02/2026 Edited   Mark Burkhart Mark Burkhart
Ok Ignore my spelling please.

28/02/2026 Edited   Mark Burkhart Mark Burkhart
It's a quandary. Murder or suicide...

28/02/2026 Edited   Mark Burkhart Mark Burkhart
Oh! I'm on the edge of my...ooff..hang on! I'm trying to get back into my seat!

27/02/2026 Edited   Pen_alias Pen_alias
Transcript: By use of deductive reasoning (which is the process of reasoning via deduction) Shercluck Hens was able ascertain, with very little probability of error, that Yorick had been murdered with a skull. And seeing as Yorick was the only skull within the immediate vicinity, it seemed the identity of the culprit was obvious… It would appear, my dear Waddleson, that for perhaps the first time in history the murder victim and the murder weapon are one and the same! What? How could that be? That doesn’t make the slightest bit of…there’s absolutely no way he could have… Yes, it’s true! I did it! What?! That Yorick: he was so smug and sure of himself with his gibes, gambols and song. I shut him up good! He had it coming and I’d do it again! Go ahead, do it again. It makes as much sense as anything else.